Thursday 16 April 2020

The welfare issues of killer whales in captivity

The first killer whale captured was in 1961. She was a female named Wanda, and lived for only two days at Marineland of the Pacific, in California1. To date there are approximately 59 orcas in captivity2, however the exact figure is not known due to the lack of information on the orcas held in Russia and China. Over the course of almost 60 years, 169 orcas have sadly lost their lives in captivity1. In the early years of the industry, the orcas in captivity had a short life span (on average 5 years), due to a lack of husbandry understanding. The most common cause of death in captivity thus far has been pneumonia1, making up a third of deaths. The captivity industry has been heavily opposed, particularly after the release of Blackfish (2013). Many ethical reasons for the opposition of captivity include the confinement in small tanks, their broken up family units (both in the wild and in captivity) and their reduced life spans3. The welfare of captive orcas is also under question, the main issues being discussed below.

Stereotypies
Abnormal repetitive behaviours, also known as stereotypies, are often regarded as an indicator of poor welfare4. Stereotypies are poorly understand in cetaceans, however circular swimming is often regarded as a stereotypical behaviour5, in the same way as pacing in terrestrial animals. Other stereotypies observed in captive orcas include: vomiting, head bobbing, comatose-like states, self-mutilation, and tongue playing6. Many of the orcas have also been observed as repetitively beaching themselves on the slide-out outside of performance times, which I have personally observed Skyla doing at Loro Parque in 2012. One of the more concerning abnormal behaviours, which can affect their physical health is biting on the bars, gates, or tank walls. The Loro Parque orcas, when they first arrived, were constantly stripping the paint off the tank walls and ingesting it. This behaviour leads onto the next welfare issue that captive orcas face.

Dental health
Although primarily a health issue this could also be considered a welfare issue. As the orcas bite on the concrete walls of their tanks, they wear down their teeth. Very few orcas in captivity have a full set of healthy teeth. As the teeth are worn down, the pup cavities become exposed. The trainers then have to intervene by either drilling their teeth or flushing the teeth to prevent infections7. These procedures must be very stressful for the orcas.  

Sun burn
This is an unusual welfare issue that the orcas encounter. As the captive orcas spend most of their life at the surface, they are more exposed to the sun’s UV rays than their wild counterparts. As a result, trainers must apply black zinc oxide as a sunscreen to the orcas, which is not necessary in the wild. Many of the SeaWorld orcas are in states that receive a lot of sun, and the stadiums lack appropriate shade to protect the orcas.

Disease/infections
Diseases and infections are of course a natural part of life. Orcas in the wild will also face these issues too. However, captivity has exposed some orcas to conditions that they may not face in the wild. Two male orcas have died in captivity as a result of disease transmission by mosquitoes. Kanduke* contracted St.Louis encephalitis virus in SeaWorld Orlando and Taku* died of West Nile Virus at SeaWorld San Antonio8. Kasatka* was also euthanized by vets after suffering from a type of bacterial pneumonia, which caused many unpleasant lesions on her skin9.

Injuries
Along with poor health caused by disease and infections, captive orcas also experience injuries as a result of their confinement. Splash*, was a male orca at SeaWorld San Diego, who received a jaw injury after having a seizure and smashing his lower jaw on a metal gate. He didn’t die as a result of this injury, however he had to have all of his bottom teeth removed and could never close it properly again10. Nakai also received a horrific injury to his lower jaw in 2012. Nakai had a massive open wound that went down to the bone. SeaWorld tried to pretend the injury was caused by Nakai catching himself on a gate, however it is possible it was the result of an altercation between a tank mate, as potential bite marks can be observed in photographs11. Fortunately Nakai recovered from this.

Social stress
Linking with Nakai’s injury, which was caused by an altercation, social stress is a prominent issue in captivity. The orcas are placed into unnatural groups. You get orcas from different ocean’s kept together, who naturally feed on different diets, and then experience family separations as orcas are transferred between parks. The orcas of Loro Parque were a key example of an unnatural grouping as Keto (aged 10), Tekoa (aged 5), Kohana (aged 3) and Skyla (aged 2) were transported there. The group did not have an adult female present to keep them in line, which goes against an orcas natural matriarchal society12. As a result, the group is very dysfunctional. Social stress can lead to orcas bullying each other, and the bullied orca is unable to escape as they would in the wild. Many captive orcas can be seen with deep rake marks.

Solitary confinement
Sadly, there are currently three orcas in captivity that live without another orca companion - Lolita at Miami Seaqurium, Kshamenk at Mundo Marino and Kiska at Marineland Canada. Kiska is the most isolated of all, as she doesn't have any form of tank mate. Lolita and Kshamenk do in fact live with dolphin companions. Lolita has shockingly spent the last 40 years alone, whereas Kshamenk has been without a partner for 20 years and Kiska for almost 9 years. For a social species, this isolation must be incredibly lonely. It is a wonder how these individuals have lasted as long as they have, particularly Lolita. 

Welfare improvements
Although I don’t have the answers to easing all of the above listed welfare problems, I have done some thinking on potential welfare improvements. For example, for the orcas that live alone (Lolita, Kiska and Kshamenk), I think feeding them live fish would be a good enrichment. I initially thought about it being used for all orcas, but was unsure as to whether live fish for multiple orcas may cause aggression problems if they fought over the food, and that’s why I thought it would be best suited for solitary orcas. Alternatively, live fish could still be fed to orcas in groups, but the orcas are sectioned off from each other (as can be done at Marineland France).

I also read an article by Law and Kitchener 201613 (Law was my lecturer at Glasgow University), and they had suggested several environmental enrichment options for captive orcas. Law had visited SeaWorld Orlando, and created these ideas, however when I visited Orlando in 2018, I never saw any of his suggestions in place. He said this could be due to the higher up people, rather than the trainers, not willing to invest in the complex enrichment for the orcas. However, if the higher ups could be convinced, these enrichment devices could hopefully be applied to improve the welfare of the orcas.

In terms of performing, I do not believe that making orcas perform entirely reduces their welfare. As many orcas are inactive at the surface the majority of their day, shows are a good change of pace. However some alterations could be to remove the most unnatural tricks (like using the slideout) and the stadium music could be changed. The music is often loud and blaring for the auditions, and so the music could be changed to be more naturalistic, calmer, ocean sounds so as not to disturb the orcas.

For the orcas that live alone, I am uncertain as how this should be addressed. The most obvious answer would be to move them to parks that have other orcas. However, having spent so long alone, entering a new social group could be incredibly stressful. The orcas that live with others aren't necessarily happier, because social hierarchies can cause conflict, and having the addition of new members can disturb the structure. For Lolita and Kshamenk who have managed this long, maybe keeping things as they are is the best solution, however Kiska's complete isolation really needs to be changed.

Regardless of your views on captivity, we still may have orcas for another 30 years, whilst this current generation dies out. Therefore it is important, that their welfare needs are met as best as possible, so that they can live out the remainder of their lives without further stress and illness.

References
4/ Broom DM 1991 Animal welfare: concepts and measurement. Journal of Animal Science 69: 4167-4175

Tuesday 14 April 2020

My view on orcas in captivity - updated

So I’ve decided to once again reflect on my view on the keeping of orcas in captivity. And once again, I don’t feel overly black and white on the matter. I don’t feel that I have a strong opinion either way. Over half my life I have been following the captive orca industry, and I feel a connection to these individuals that I have come to know. When I watched Blackfish for the first time back in 2013, I sat there feeling very uncomfortable, because everything they highlighted I already knew about, and I still hadn’t been swayed to an anti-captivity opinion (which obviously the movie wanted to make you feel). As the public opposition to the captive industry grew, I’ve almost felt as if I have had to hide the fact that I still want to see captive orcas. I’ve been labelled a hypocrite for studying animal welfare yet not being anti-captivity. It is actually an ambition of mine to do a world tour of every park around the world that has orcas, and I want to do this to honour my 11 year old self who gained this unique interest. I hope to do this over a few months in perhaps 2023, once I have saved enough money.

But my point is, just because I want to see orcas in captivity, does not mean I am pro-captivity. The welfare issues that orcas suffer from mean that captive enclosures are not suitable for them. I disagree with the artificial social groupings, and inability for the orcas to escape each other, which can lead to heightened aggression. I’ve seen the rake marks on orcas, even on 4 day old Athena (back in 2004), which may not be so prevalent in wild populations. Fortunately the Western parks seem to have stopped transferring their orcas around (the last orca being transferred between parks was Shouka in August 2012 to SeaWorld San Diego)[1], and separating mothers and calves, which may have been a result of The Blackfish Effect. It’s also very depressing when visiting the parks and to see many of them floating at the surface so lifelessly (which I remember very well Keet being like this). It’s as if they are completely disengaged from each other and their surroundings. I’m very pleased that SeaWorld announced this would be their last generations of orcas in 2016 [2], and it seems to be the case for the other Western parks too (except for Loro Parque who gained baby Ula in September 2018).


However, I am not entirely sold on the sea pen proposal anymore. After doing some reading, I actually found it very interesting that sea pens may not be the best option after all. Ocean noise is actually a serious problem for wild cetaceans (and has caused many cetaceans to strand and die)[3], and therefore being in a sea pen they may be exposed to such uncontrollable noises. There is also the risk of people cutting the sea pens and releasing the orcas into the wild (many of which, the captive-born ones, probably won’t be able to survive for too long). It is also possible that plastic and other debris may get inside the sea pen. The maintenance of sea pens is actually seemingly very complex, with different challenges to captive enclosures. The financial cost of transferring every captive orca into a sea pen would also be incredibly high. The cost to rehabilitate Keiko in Iceland, was supposedly $20 million [34]. Granted, this was a rehabilitation effort, whereas the aim of the relocating captive orcas into sea pens isn’t to release them, this does still show that it would be far from inexpensive. Cost aside, I also don’t even think the parks will surrender their orcas to this project – activists have been campaigning for Lolita to be moved from the Miami Seaquarium for decades, and have yet to have any success, therefore I can’t see the parks will give up their orcas for this cause.

Therefore, I think the most realistic option is to just let this remaining generation of orcas live out the rest of their lives in captivity. And whilst they must remain in captivity, they will be under the care of trainers who genuinely do love the orcas and want what’s best for them. Trainers are not bad people at all. I’m still indecisive on whether orcas should perform or not. As said above, I have seen orcas be very inactive in-between shows, therefore I don’t think that shows are entirely bad, as they do offer a change of pace for the orcas. However some of the unnatural tricks could definitely be phased out, such as making orcas “break-spin” on the slide outs.

As I’ve said in my 2015 post, I am very concerned about the growing orca industry in the East. I do not support orcas being taken from the wild. I am also concerned about the welfare issues that the orcas may face in these countries (as I have seen first-hand poor welfare conditions for bears in China). This is going to be a difficult matter to tackle. Fortunately there was mass public outcry at the captures of the orcas and belugas being held in the “Whale Jail” in Russia in 2018/2019, which led to their release [5]. Therefore, hopefully it is less likely that any further wild captures will go ahead, as the world is now watching. But as the captive orca industry in the East is in its early stages, it may take a while for them to reach the point that we are at now in the West.

I’m sure within my lifetime I will see the end of the captive orca industry in its entirety, which is the best outcome for the orcas welfare. However, whilst I still have the chance, I do want to take advantage of the possibility of seeing the captive orcas I have come to know, before it becomes a thing of the past…

References

Sunday 12 April 2020

A brief history of UK dolphinariums


The holding of cetaceans (whales, dolphins and porpoises) in captivity dates back to the 1800s. The first cetaceans held in captivity were a pair of belugas, captured in Canada in 1861, and held in PT Barnum’s American Museum in New York [1]. In total he took nine belugas into captivity, but due to being unable to keep them alive for too long, he eventually stopped taking belugas by 1865 [1]. The industry gained momentum in the 1960s, due to the movie and TV show Flipper [2]. Since then, cetaceans have been held in captivity on every continent (except for Antarctica).

The UK’s first captive cetaceans were harbour porpoises held at the Brighton Aquarium as early as 1874 [3]. A female beluga whale also survived for only four days at the Westminster Aquarium in 1877 [4]. The following year, another beluga replaced the one at Westminster Aquarium, and an additional two were sent to Manchester and Blackpool, supposedly supplied by PT Burnam [5].

As with the global industry, the UK dolphinarium industry took off from the 1960s. The first purpose built dolphinarium was at Flamingo Land in Yorkshire in 1963 [6]. Over a 30 year period, more than 30 dolphinariums and travelling shows existed in the UK, housing approximately 300 dolphins [7]. Some of the facilities were only seasonal shows, whereas the majority were permanent fixtures. Of the species kept, the most popular were bottlenose dolphins, but the UK also held 8 orcas, and belugas and pilot whales temporarily. For a full list of the facilities where the dolphins were held, see below.

The conditions that the UK’s captive cetaceans were kept in were extremely inadequate, due to a lack of regulation. Many were held in swimming pools meant for people or in indoor facilities with no natural light. It wasn’t until 1984 that the Zoo Licensing Act came into place, which enforced some husbandry standards. However, after a review of UK dolphinariums it was deemed that many facilities were not keeping dolphins in appropriate conditions. A report titled ‘A Review of Dolphinaria’ by Klinowska and Brown concluded that their recommendations for holding cetaceans in captivity, such as increasing the pool size, should be implemented no later than 1993 [6].

For many years, the keeping of cetaceans in captivity was fiercely opposed, which in 1991 sparked the project Into The Blue. Supported by the Born Free Foundation and World Society of Protection of Animals, the group campaigned to close the remaining dolphinariums in the UK and also release a select few dolphins. The chosen candidates were Rocky from Marineland Morecambe, and Missie and Silver from Brighton Aquarium. They were transferred to a rehabilitation pen in the Caribbean in early 1991, and then released from the West Caicos Island in September 1991 [6].

After the phasing out of dolphinariums, the final dolphins housed in the UK at Flamingo Land were sent to a facility in Europe in 1993 [6]. There has never been any cetaceans in captivity in the UK since then.

Currently, under UK law it is still legal to house cetaceans in captivity. However, the requirements to house them have been set to such a high standard, that no facility has been willing to implement them, and therefore, will not hold cetaceans.


List of UK dolphinariums
* = seasonal show / ** = held orcas

60s
+ Blackpool Dolphinarium (Blackpool, England) - 1969*

70s
Gwrych Castle (Abergele, Wales) - 1970*
Durley Chine (Bournemouth, England) – 1970*
Weymouth Dolphinarium (Weymouth, England) - 1971*
Battersea Park Dolphinarium (London, England) - 1971 - 1973
London Dolphinarium (London, England) - 1971 – 1973
Southsea Dolphinarium (Portsmouth, England) - 1973*
Cleethorpes Marineland & Zoo (Cleethorpes, England) - 1966 - 1974** (Calypso)
Porthcawl Dolphinarium (Porthcawl, Wales) - 1971 - 1974
Dudley Zoo (Dudley, England) - 1971 - 1974** (Cuddles)
South Elmsall Animal Training School And Dolphinarium (South Elmsall, England) - 1972 - 1974
Rhyl Dolphinarium (Rhyl, Wales) - 1972 - 1974
Brean Down Dolphinarium (Brean Down, England) - 1974*
Southend Dolphinarium (Southend-on-Sea, England) - 1970 - 1975
Skegness Dolphinarium (Skegness, England) - 1972 - 1975
Coventry Zoo Dolphinarium (Coventry, England) - 1972 - 1975
Ocean Park (Sunderland, England) - 1973 - 1975
Royalty Folies (London, England) - 1974*
Sandown Dolphinarium (Isle Of Wight, England) - 1974 - 1975
West Midlands Safari Park Dolphinarium (Kidderminster, England) - 1975*
Queen’s Motel Dolphinarium (Margate, England) - 1969 - 1977

80s
Woburn Safari Park Dolphinarium (Woburn, England) - 1973 - 1983
Scarborough Marineland and Zoo (Scarborough, England) - 1969 - 1984
Blair Drummond Safari Park Dolphinarium (Stirling, Scotland) - 1974 - 1984
Clacton Pier Dolphinarium (Clacton-on-Sea, England) - 1971 - 1985** (Unnamed, Suzi Wong/Hoi Wai, Neptune, Nemo)
Knowsley Safari Park Dolphinarium (Knowsley, England) - 1972 - 1985
Whipsnade Zoo (Whipsnade, England) - 1972 - 1988

90s
Marineland (Morecambe, England) - 1964 - 1990
Brighton Aquarium and Dolphinarium (Brighton, England) - 1968 - 1990
Windsor Safari Park (Windsor, England) - 1970 - 1992** (Ramu 3/Winston, Suzi Wong/Hoi Wai, Winnie, Nemo)
Flamingo Land (Kirby, England) - 1963 - 1993** (Cuddles)

References